Duration: 05:06 minutes Upload Time: 2007-06-14 21:21:52 User: muzicmaker2001 :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Tags:
wtc 9/11 911 tower flight trade north fire jet fuel Edna Cintron south conspiracy terrorist bush
Description: Did fire really cause the collapse of the WTCs? |
|
Comments | |
GnosticNinja ::: Favorites 2008-01-14 18:41:03 Please be sure to see: September Clues & 9/11 Taboo. Oh, and if your still deluded like wanderersix8... instead of spouting baseless insults, howa' bout you address the content of the video instead? Prove it wrong! Or is that just it? You can't? watch?v=hvYqRTPtrNc __________________________________________________ | |
wanderersix8 ::: Favorites 2008-01-07 07:00:46 You douche bag, your an idiot it was a big ass plane so just shut up __________________________________________________ | |
ferdcr ::: Favorites 2008-01-02 10:46:00 Those people survived because they were not on a place with intense fire, that doesnt mean that elsewhere the fire was intense enough to weaken a steel structure that was allready damaged by the plane crash. __________________________________________________ | |
fred10538 ::: Favorites 2007-12-24 10:17:38 His name is Eric Hufschmidt and this is a pieve of his video "Painful deceptions" __________________________________________________ | |
CheeezMaster ::: Favorites 2007-12-19 08:07:32 what's wrong with being homosexual? __________________________________________________ | |
KSjetmech04 ::: Favorites 2007-12-15 22:07:20 I agree, he's very annoying __________________________________________________ | |
davennnnn ::: Favorites 2007-12-15 01:00:59 god dangit. this narrator HAS to DIE!!! his voice is SO annoying!! he sounds like a homosexual!!! damnit! 'she wears white pants and has LONG hair'....FAG __________________________________________________ | |
psikeyhackr ::: Favorites 2007-12-03 16:20:32 My video asks for the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the WTC. Do you need to be a fire protection engineer to figure out it must take some time to heat steel capable of holding 30 stories of building? Yet we are supposed to believe fire could make the south tower collapse in 56 minutes but no on bothers to tell us the tons of steel and concrete on every floor. If you can believe it that is your problem. watch?v=z0kUICwO93Q __________________________________________________ | |
psikeyhackr ::: Favorites 2007-12-01 11:18:51 NIST says 11 sec. for one tower and 9 sec. for the other. tinyurl dotcom/2upw8k And of course this is explained by the fact that the buildings were 70% air by volume. So says Dr. Sunder Dunderhead. ROFLMAO __________________________________________________ | |
psikeyhackr ::: Favorites 2007-12-01 11:07:05 "steel core perimeter" and you talk about comprehension. LOL __________________________________________________ | |
jizzmonger ::: Favorites 2007-12-01 01:28:43 This coming from somebody too stupid to comprehend that steel and concrete perform differently in fire conditions. __________________________________________________ | |
jizzmonger ::: Favorites 2007-12-01 01:27:54 You're not asking questions. You are making implications. Shit, you can't even tell the difference. __________________________________________________ | |
psikeyhackr ::: Favorites 2007-11-21 02:06:50 You think just being steel is the explanation for everything? Was the steel thick enough to hold another 30 stories? Was it connected to enough steel to conduct the heat away. NO! it was mounted to CONCRETE that wouldn't conduct. Notice I am talking about the QUANTITY of steel that had to be on the 80th floor and FIFTY SIX MINUTES to fail. How long did it take that steel to fail? DUH! The EXPERTS aren't telling us how much there was. Do you have a problem with asking questions? __________________________________________________ | |
Koenig39 ::: Favorites 2007-11-21 00:28:37 Maybe you should brush up on your reading comprehension before you reply. Go back and read what collapsed. See it? The steel core perimeter. The rest of the building was supported with concrete cores. Concrete is fire resistant, thus the rest of the structure remained. WTC only contained concrete on the office floors. There rest of the structure was built with steel cores. Plus, an aircraft taking out 1/4 of the support at the upper floors hastens its failure. __________________________________________________ | |
Koenig39 ::: Favorites 2007-11-21 00:25:12 Are you this oblivious? Did you forget you posted this? "The Towers were built to withstand the impact of a fully loaded 707, possibly two." __________________________________________________ |
Friday, January 18, 2008
WTC Fires and the Collapse (Part Two)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment